FIRM   ATTORNEYS   PRACTICE AREAS   RESOURCES   NEWS   PUBLICATIONS   CONTACT
Balanced Services

 

CLIENT ALERT - April 7, 2004


Contact: Steven B. Harz, Esq., Chairman
Labor & Employment Law Group
(201) 342-6000

NEW JERSEY APPELLATE COURT PUTS GREATER BURDEN ON EMPLOYERS WHEN EMPLOYEES REQUEST FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT (FMLA) LEAVE

Dear Clients and Friends:

On March 29, 2004, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court issued a major decision regarding employees requesting Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave. The practical effect of the Court’s decision in Hutchens v. Board of Review, Department of Labor, et al., among other things, requires an employer to grant FMLA leave when the employee provides enough information to alert the employer of the need for FMLA leave, even when FMLA leave is not specifically requested by the employee.

Hutchens worked as a receptionist for Motion Systems Corp. from August 3, 1999 to January 12, 2002. At the hearing in the matter, Hutchens testified that she had requested that the employer allow her time off to care for her ill parents. She acknowledged, however, that she did not specifically request leave from her job pursuant to the terms of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C.A. § 2601 et seq., stating that she was unaware of the federal statute at the time of her request.

The Court made clear that employees are not required to possess “encyclopedic knowledge of their legal rights in order to invoke the benefits of family leave,” but rather, the court should focus on “the employer and its obligations.” The Appellate Court held that if an employer requires more information to determine whether FMLA leave is being requested or any other ambiguity in the employee’s request for leave, the burden shifts to the employer to determine if the leave requested is FMLA qualifying leave by inquiring further. The employer’s duties are triggered under FMLA when an employee provides information sufficient to put the employer on notice of the need for FMLA leave. Once circumstances indicate that an employee is entitled to FMLA leave, the employer has an obligation to inquire further in order to ascertain the specific details.

If you have any questions with regard to the application of this case to your Company or with respect to any other labor and employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Steven B. Harz, Esq. at (201) 342-6000 or via e-mail at sharz@hertenburstein.com.
 

Client Alert


Labor/Employment

March 19, 2007
June 26, 2006
April 9, 2006

January 11, 2006
July 28, 2005
March 3, 2005

June 30, 2004
April 7, 2004 
April 3, 2003
January 25, 2002

Real Estate

August, 1 2007

 
 
          FIRM   ATTORNEYS   PRACTICE AREAS   RESOURCES   NEWS   PUBLICATIONS   CONTACT
 

© Copyright 2005 by: Herten, Burstein, Sheridan, Cevasco, Bottinelli,  Litt & Harz L.L.C.